Using Cell Phones for M2M Site Selection? There’s Gotta Be A Better Way

While network engineers can simulate network performance using mathematical models, drive testing and walk-about site surveys are still an essential part of network planning, site selection and troubleshooting. Real world testing is time and labor intensive, but it’s the only way of getting a real-world assessment of network performance at specific locations.

Wireless network testing is typically done with cell phones or purpose-built RF receivers. While both testing methods have their place, relying on consumer cell phones for all kinds of RF testing has significant drawbacks.

Less accurate measurements. There is no standard for the number of signal bars on a cell phone. Some have four, some five or more. Most feature phones do not display the actual signal strength in dBm, and some phone models simply get better reception than others due to their construction. The phone’s body material and the placement of the antenna make a big difference in the reception quality.

Costs associated with purchasing, operating and maintaining multiple devices. Some drive testing setups require two cell phones, one to make calls and one to remain idle during the test. This means carrying multiple phones with active lines of service for testing purposes. Most modern cell phones are designed for the consumer market and are not ruggedized for use in the field. A short fall or exposure to moisture can put them out of commission permanently. The devices are also at risk of theft or loss.

No ability to lock onto signal from a specific tower. Cell phones are designed to prefer the strongest signal. This means the phone will choose a compatible tower with the strongest signal, which could be an issue if the site is on the edge of the cellular provider’s coverage area. When the coverage area of the tower shrinks due to load or environmental factors, the M2M device could choose another carrier’s tower and incur roaming fees.

More equipment is needed. A typical drive testing setup includes a laptop computer, RF scanner, GPS receiver and at least one cell phone. The data collection software sometimes requires a security dongle that connects to the computer via USB.

Increased risk of test failure. If any of these components or connections fails, the operator will lose valuable data and may have to repeat the test. There’s nothing more frustrating than completing a route and finding the data wasn’t collected or saved properly.

For ease-of-use and the most accurate test results, engineers should rely on RF receivers designed and built specifically for their needs. Learn more about Squid 3G and 4G M2M receivers from Berkeley.